Login.Health: User-Feature Matrix Design Document

1. Introduction

The User-Feature Matrix maps Login.Health's feature set against our primary and secondary user personas to ensure our product development aligns with user needs and prioritizes the most impactful features for each user group. This document serves as a critical reference for product management, development, and UX design teams to guide feature prioritization and user experience design.

2. User Personas Overview

Login.Health serves several distinct user personas, each with specific needs, goals, and pain points. For reference, below is a summary of our key personas:

Primary Personas (Phase 1 Focus)

Persona	Description	Key Goals	Pain Points
Health Tech Developer	Alex Chen (35), CTO at healthcare startup	• Integrate patient data securely • Reduce compliance overhead • Implement secure authentication • Access normalized health data	• Fragmented APIs • Complex compliance requirements • High integration costs • Limited data availability
Healthcare Provider	Dr. Sarah Johnson (42), Primary Care Physician	• Access complete patient history • Reduce administrative burden • Securely share/receive patient data • Improve clinical decision-making	• Incomplete medical records • Time-consuming record retrieval • Unreliable patient recall • Manual data entry/reconciliation

Secondary Personas (Phase 2 Focus)

Persona	Description	Key Goals	Pain Points
Patient	Michael Rodriguez (58), Manages chronic conditions	• Access all health records in one place • Share specific information with providers • Control access to health information • Coordinate care across specialists	• Repeatedly filling out forms • Missing records at new providers • Difficulty tracking information • Limited visibility into access
Family Caregiver	Lisa Thompson (45), Daughter caring for elderly parent	• Access parent's medical information • Coordinate care across providers • Receive updates on treatments • Manage appointments and tasks	• Limited access to information • Difficulty communicating with providers • Tracking medications and treatments • Repeating information to providers

Additional Personas (Future Focus)

Persona	Description	Key Goals	Pain Points
Healthcare Administrator	Robert Washington (52), Director of Health Information Management	• Streamline registration processes • Reduce administrative overhead • Ensure compliance • Improve patient satisfaction	• Manual record retrieval • High administrative costs • Compliance risk • Patient complaints
Insurance Provider	Jennifer Martinez (39), Care Coordinator at health insurance company	• Access accurate patient information • Streamline prior authorization • Improve care coordination • Reduce unnecessary procedures	• Delayed or incomplete information • Manual processing of requests • Coordination challenges • Limited visibility across providers

3. Feature Set Overview

Login.Health's features are organized into six core functional areas:

1. Authentication System
2. Surrogate System
3. Personal Health Record (PHR) Management
4. Provider Integration
5. Care Circle Management
6. Developer Platform

Each area includes multiple features with specific capabilities addressing user needs.

4. User-Feature Matrix

The matrix below maps each feature to our user personas, indicating:

• Primary (P): Essential features for this persona
• Secondary (S): Beneficial but not essential features
• Not Applicable (—): Features not relevant to this persona

4.1 Authentication System Features

Feature	Health Tech Developer	Healthcare Provider	Patient	Family Caregiver	Healthcare Admin	Insurance Provider
User Registration & Login	P	P	P	P	S	S
Multi-factor Authentication	P	S	S	S	P	P
Single Sign-On (SSO)	P	P	S	S	P	S
Session Management	P	S	—	—	—	—
Profile Management	S	S	P	P	—	—
Password Recovery	S	S	P	P	S	S
Login Activity Monitoring	P	S	S	S	P	S

4.2 Surrogate System Features

Feature	Health Tech Developer	Healthcare Provider	Patient	Family Caregiver	Healthcare Admin	Insurance Provider
Surrogate Invitation	S	S	P	P	—	—
Verification Process	P	S	P	P	S	—
Confirmation Workflow	S	S	P	P	—	—
Permission Management	P	S	P	P	S	—
Surrogate Hierarchy	S	—	S	P	—	—
Temporary Access	P	P	S	S	S	S
Activity Logging	P	S	S	P	P	S

4.3 Personal Health Record (PHR) Management Features

Feature	Health Tech Developer	Healthcare Provider	Patient	Family Caregiver	Healthcare Admin	Insurance Provider
Health Record Storage	P	P	P	P	S	S
Data Import/Export	P	P	P	S	P	S
Record Timeline	S	P	P	P	—	S
Document Management	S	P	P	P	P	S
Health Summary	S	P	P	P	—	P
Search & Filter	P	P	P	P	S	S
Version History	P	S	S	S	P	S

4.4 Provider Integration Features

Feature	Health Tech Developer	Healthcare Provider	Patient	Family Caregiver	Healthcare Admin	Insurance Provider
EHR Connectors	P	P	S	—	P	S
FHIR API Support	P	S	—	—	S	P
Provider Directory	S	P	P	P	P	P
Data Normalization	P	S	—	—	S	P
Provider Portal	S	P	—	—	P	S
Appointment Integration	S	P	P	P	S	—
Lab Result Integration	S	P	P	P	—	S

4.5 Care Circle Management Features

Feature	Health Tech Developer	Healthcare Provider	Patient	Family Caregiver	Healthcare Admin	Insurance Provider
Circle Creation	S	S	P	P	—	—
Member Management	S	S	P	P	—	—
Permission Settings	P	S	P	P	S	—
Care Coordination	—	P	P	P	—	P
Task Management	—	S	P	P	—	S
Communication	—	P	P	P	—	S
Calendar Integration	—	S	P	P	—	—

4.6 Developer Platform Features

Feature	Health Tech Developer	Healthcare Provider	Patient	Family Caregiver	Healthcare Admin	Insurance Provider
RESTful API	P	S	—	—	S	P
SDK Libraries	P	—	—	—	—	S
HIPAA-Compliant DB Wrapper	P	—	—	—	P	P
Developer Portal	P	—	—	—	S	S
API Documentation	P	S	—	—	S	S
Sandbox Environment	P	S	—	—	S	S
Usage Analytics	P	S	—	—	P	S

5. Feature Priority Matrix

Based on the user-feature mapping, we can establish the overall priority of features by evaluating their importance across user personas. The matrix below shows the prioritization for development:

5.1 High Impact, Low Complexity Features

These features should be prioritized first due to their high value and lower implementation complexity:

Feature	Primary Users	Value Proposition	Technical Complexity
User Registration & Login	All Users	Core access functionality	Low
Health Record Storage	All Users	Foundation of platform value	Medium
Permission Management	Patients, Caregivers, Developers	Core security capability	Medium
RESTful API	Developers	Essential integration capability	Medium
Surrogate Invitation	Patients, Caregivers	Fundamental surrogate function	Low

5.2 High Impact, High Complexity Features

These features deliver significant value but require more development resources:

Feature	Primary Users	Value Proposition	Technical Complexity
EHR Connectors	Providers, Developers	Critical data access	High
FHIR API Support	Developers, Providers	Standards-based interoperability	High
Data Normalization	Developers, Providers	Consistent data access	High
HIPAA-Compliant DB Wrapper	Developers, Admins	Simplified compliance	High
Search & Filter	All Users	Finding relevant information	Medium

5.3 Medium Impact Features

These features provide moderate value and should be included in later development phases:

Feature	Primary Users	Value Proposition	Technical Complexity
Record Timeline	Patients, Providers, Caregivers	Chronological health view	Medium
Provider Directory	Patients, Caregivers, Providers	Finding connected providers	Medium
Task Management	Patients, Caregivers	Coordinating care activities	Medium
Usage Analytics	Developers, Admins	Platform utilization insights	Medium
Document Management	Patients, Providers, Caregivers	Storing medical documents	Medium

5.4 Lower Priority Features

These features can be deferred to later development phases:

Feature	Primary Users	Value Proposition	Technical Complexity
Calendar Integration	Patients, Caregivers	Appointment management	Medium
Version History	Developers, Admins	Record change tracking	Low
Lab Result Integration	Patients, Providers	Specialized data access	High
Surrogate Hierarchy	Caregivers	Complex care networks	High
Communication	Patients, Providers, Caregivers	Secure messaging	Medium

6. Feature Development Phases

Based on the user-feature matrix and priority assessment, we recommend the following phased approach to feature development:

7. User Journey Mapping

To validate our feature prioritization, we've mapped key user journeys for each primary persona:

7.1 Health Tech Developer Journey

Key features needed:

• RESTful API
• SDK Libraries
• Developer Portal
• HIPAA-Compliant DB Wrapper
• Authentication System

7.2 Healthcare Provider Journey

Key features needed:

• EHR Connectors
• Health Record Storage
• Provider Portal
• Lab Result Integration
• Data Import/Export

7.3 Patient Journey

Key features needed:

• User Registration & Login
• Surrogate Invitation
• Permission Management
• Health Record Storage
• Provider Directory

7.4 Family Caregiver Journey

Key features needed:

• Surrogate Authentication
• Permission Management
• Health Record Access
• Task Management
• Care Circle Management

8. Feature Requirements Alignment

The table below maps key user needs to specific features, validating that our feature set addresses the most important requirements:

User Need	Corresponding Feature(s)	Primary Persona(s)	Priority
Secure access to health data	Authentication System, Permission Management	All	P0
Managing family member's care	Surrogate System, Care Circle Management	Patient, Caregiver	P0
Comprehensive health record	Health Record Storage, Data Import/Export	All	P0
Provider data integration	EHR Connectors, FHIR API Support	Provider, Developer	P0
Developer integration	RESTful API, SDK Libraries, DB Wrapper	Developer	P0
Finding relevant information	Search & Filter, Health Summary	All	P1
Coordinating care	Task Management, Communication	Patient, Caregiver, Provider	P1
Tracking health changes	Record Timeline, Version History	Patient, Provider	P1
Managing documents	Document Management	Patient, Provider, Caregiver	P1
Monitoring system usage	Usage Analytics, Activity Logging	Developer, Admin	P2

9. Feature Specification Process

For each feature in the matrix, a detailed specification will be created following this process:

1. Feature Definition

   • Clear description of functionality
   • User stories and acceptance criteria
   • Scope boundaries

2. User Research Validation

   • Usability testing with relevant personas
   • User feedback incorporation
   • Iteration based on findings

3. Technical Specification

   • Architecture integration
   • API endpoints
   • Data models
   • Security considerations

4. Implementation Planning

   • Development effort estimation
   • Resource allocation
   • Testing requirements
   • Deployment strategy

10. Metrics and Success Criteria

Each feature will be evaluated based on these success metrics:

Metric Category	Specific Metrics	Measurement Method
User Adoption	• Feature usage rate • Time to first use • Retention rate	• Analytics tracking • User session analysis
User Satisfaction	• Satisfaction score • Ease of use rating • Net Promoter Score	• In-app surveys • User interviews • Support ticket analysis
Technical Performance	• Response time • Error rate • Uptime • Resource usage	• Performance monitoring • Error logging • Infrastructure metrics
Business Impact	• User growth • Revenue impact • Competitive advantage	• Business analytics • Market analysis • Customer acquisition data

11. Conclusion and Recommendations

Based on the user-feature matrix analysis, we recommend:

1. Phased Implementation Approach

   • Focus on the foundation features in Phase 1
   • Progressively add complexity in subsequent phases
   • Validate with users between phases

2. User-Centered Development

   • Prioritize features based on user impact
   • Include representatives from key persona groups in testing
   • Iterate based on user feedback

3. Technical Considerations

   • Build authentication and permission systems with extensibility in mind
   • Design data models to accommodate future feature expansion
   • Implement API-first approach for maximum flexibility

4. Success Measurement

   • Establish baseline metrics before feature release
   • Track adoption and satisfaction metrics continuously
   • Compare against industry benchmarks where available

This User-Feature Matrix will be reviewed quarterly and updated based on user feedback, market changes, and technical developments to ensure Login.Health continues to meet user needs effectively.

Appendix A: Feature Definitions

Feature	Definition	Key Capabilities
User Registration & Login	Core authentication functionality for all users	• Email/password authentication • Social login options • Account creation and validation
Multi-factor Authentication	Additional security layer for user authentication	• SMS verification • Authenticator app integration • Email verification codes
Single Sign-On (SSO)	Unified authentication across multiple healthcare systems	• OAuth 2.0 implementation • SAML support • Cross-system identity management
Surrogate Invitation	Process for adding authorized representatives	• Email/SMS invitations • QR code sharing • Time-limited invitation links
Permission Management	Granular control over data access and sharing	• Resource-level permissions • Time-bound access • Purpose-based limitations
Health Record Storage	Secure storage of patient health information	• FHIR-compatible data models • Document storage • Encrypted data at rest
EHR Connectors	Integration with provider electronic health records	• API-based integration • Data synchronization • Provider authentication

Appendix B: Detailed User Personas

Expanded details on primary user personas to inform feature design:

Health Tech Developer (Alex Chen)

Demographics:

• 35 years old
• CTO at healthcare startup
• Technical background with 10+ years experience
• Based in San Francisco

Technical Profile:

• Proficient in modern web technologies
• Experience with RESTful APIs
• Familiar with OAuth 2.0
• Some healthcare integration experience

Motivations:

• Building innovative healthcare solutions
• Reducing development time and costs
• Ensuring compliance with regulations
• Creating seamless user experiences

Usage Context:

• Development environment
• Testing with sample data
• Integration planning
• API documentation references

Healthcare Provider (Dr. Sarah Johnson)

Demographics:

• 42 years old
• Primary Care Physician
• 15 years in practice
• Works in multi-provider clinic

Technical Profile:

• Basic technology proficiency
• Uses EHR daily (Epic system)
• Limited time for technology learning
• Relies on staff for some technical tasks

Motivations:

• Improving patient care quality
• Reducing administrative burden
• Ensuring complete medical information
• Coordinating with specialists

Usage Context:

• Busy clinical environment
• Between patient appointments
• During patient consultations
• Care team collaboration

Appendix C: Feature Impact Assessment

Feature	Patient Impact	Provider Impact	Developer Impact	Overall Impact Score
User Registration & Login	5	4	5	4.7
Health Record Storage	5	5	5	5.0
Permission Management	5	3	5	4.3
EHR Connectors	4	5	5	4.7
RESTful API	2	3	5	3.3
Surrogate Invitation	5	3	3	3.7
HIPAA-Compliant DB Wrapper	3	3	5	3.7
Search & Filter	4	5	4	4.3
Record Timeline	5	4	3	4.0
Task Management	4	3	2	3.0

Impact scored on 1-5 scale where 5 is highest impact